By the time I publish this article, Conceptart.org had been offline for close to six months. The forum went offline at the end of 2019’s summer. I miss the place. Conceptart.org was probably the website I was most active with compared to any other art social media place/forum. I am a member of other art forums/sites longer than I have ever been a member of Conceptart.org, but that website was the forum that defined my art practice today. Conceptart.org was the first site to entice me to join art challenges every day.
Missing the place got me to thinking about the constant availability of art prompts in the site. I realize now that almost the totality of my current artwork is governed by art prompts and art challenges. It has been a long time since I had innovated with my own ideas.
The image above is part of a series of “robot paintings” I was working on back in the day. These paintings are about the last set of artwork I remember as being “original” in thought. I define “original” very loosely here, given that being “original” is really difficult in today’s art world. I defined the paintings “original” since I didn’t have a prompt to get me to paint robots. I just painted robots because I wanted to paint them… no art prompts needed.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with art prompts/challenges though. In fact, I love them more now than pursuing some of my own ideas. I love the challenge of interpreting the prompt. Some prompts can get downright wacky I can’t think of a way to illustrate it. Those prompts end up feeling like a puzzle of sorts. Sometimes I misinterpret the prompt, which gives hilarious results at times like my mishap last week;
But more importantly, and above all, I love prompts because of the feeling of “community” that it gives. When I join an art prompt/art challenge, I become part of something that is more than me… I’m not just one artist creating artwork, I’m one of many… an army of creators. It’s family, yah know?
So yeah… even though I still have my own ideas that I want to pursue (I still need to finish that children’s book and create more Pinoy paintings!), art prompts and art challenges have become part of my artistic journey… a very important part of my journey. I honestly can’t think of ever passing a day without working on an artwork that is a challenge from the online art community.
With that being said, I am off to create!
The Graphic Artists Guild and The American Institute of Graphic Arts and practically every Art and Design Organization are immensely against Spec Work. They are absolutely right in taking a strong stance against such practice. Spec work, at its very core, demeans and belittles the artist. Spec work basically asks for free artwork without having to pay the artist. This is obviously wrong. The problem with Spec Work though is that it typically looks like an art prompt/art challenge. For a beginner, it is sometimes difficult to decipher which is which.
Many articles have been written about the subject, so I don’t need to write a great deal about it. The simplest advice I can give a beginner when doing art prompts/art challenges is to ask themselves “who will own the rights to the images after the prompt/contest/challenge is done?” If the image rights are owned by the “contest sponsor,” THEN AVOID THESE CONTESTS AT ALL COSTS!!! Those contests are SPEC WORK disguising themselves as something else.
A good example of a legitimate challenge is the Character Design Challenge hosted by https://characterdesignreferences.com/. It is stated in their challenge FAQ that the submitting artist will always be the rights holder of the submitted image, not the design sponsor. This is what a beginning artist should look for, an explicitly mentioned statement that validates the ownership of the image. There are other telltale signs that will indicate whether a contest is Spec work or not. I am not going to cover any of them. I’m just going to focus on the rights issue. I think this is the most important telltale sign if a contest is Spec work or not. If the “contest” states that the image ownership belongs to the artist, then the contest is legit. If the “contest” states that the image ownerships belongs to the “contest sponsors,” then this is Spec work. The latter scenario means that the contest sponsors can benefit from an artist’s work without paying the artist. The former scenario means that the contest sponsor can not benefit from an artist’s work without paying the artist.
This rule-of-thumb can also be applied to art tests. Valid companies use “art tests” to see if the ones they are hiring really are artists. These kinds of “art tests” are fine. But be forewarned that there are impostors out there pretending to be legit companies asking potential employees for “art tests” so that they can get free artwork without having to pay the artist. If a beginning artist finds themselves in this situation, always clarify with the “employer” what their aim for the art test is and who gets to own the image rights afterward. If the “employer” says they will own the image rights, then avoid doing any work for them.
This is pretty much all I can say on this matter. If anyone who happens to read this wants to know more information, then check the AIGA and the GAG websites. They have tons of information regarding the subject matter.art challenges art opinions art philosophy art prompts art theories art theory art thoughts cgsociety.com cgsociety.org conceptart.org idea ideas no to spec work spec work Art Thoughts and Lessons
I don't like ads. I don't think anyone likes ads. But they do play a pivotal role in our lives. In my case, ads help pay the bills. So unfortunately, advertisements will go here. The good news is that I have not set up advertisements for this website yet. Yay! But if you do want to help me out in the smallest of ways, then head over to my YouTube Channel and subscribe. Not only will you be helping me out, you will also learn a thing or two about my art! Hooray for learning!
All Rights Reserved @Edgar Ej. Site powered by Godaddy, Wordpress, and a few cookies... Oatmeal Raisin cookies to be exact.